Home » Briefs » Eggnatz, et al v. The Kellogg Company, et al.

Services

Econ One’s expert economists have experience across a wide variety of services including antitrust, class certification, damages, financial markets and securities, intellectual property, international arbitration, labor and employment, and valuation and financial analysis.

Resources

Econ One’s resources including blogs, cases, news, and more provide a collection of materials from Econ One’s experts.

Cases and Engagements
Get an Inside look at Economics with the experts.
August 12, 2015

Eggnatz, et al v. The Kellogg Company, et al.

The plaintiffs filed a class action on behalf of U.S. consumers (excluding California) alleging that Kashi, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kellogg, had falsely claimed that its products were “all-natural” when they actually contained genetically modified organisms which the plaintiffs claimed could result in insecticides and other chemicals inserted into plants’ genetic codes remaining in consumers’ blood after ingestion. The relevant products included Kashi GoLean Crunch! cereal and a number of Kashi-branded granola and protein bars.

Econ One was retained by counsel for the plaintiff class to quantify damages to consumers attributable to the defendants’ false claims. Dr. David Sharp submitted an expert report which utilized hedonic regression methodology in order to calculate class-wide damages based on the price premium that consumers paid that was associated with the defendants’ “all natural” claim. The case settled prior to trial when the defendant agreed to compensate consumers and remove the “all natural” claims from products containing the challenged ingredients.

Share this Article
Latest Related Resources and Insights