|
Home » Briefs » Margie Daniel et al. vs. Ford Motor Company

Services

Econ One’s expert economists have experience across a wide variety of services including antitrust, class certification, damages, financial markets and securities, intellectual property, international arbitration, labor and employment, and valuation and financial analysis.

Resources

Econ One’s resources including blogs, cases, news, and more provide a collection of materials from Econ One’s experts.

Cases and Engagements

Get an Inside look at Economics with the experts.
Consultant to the Firm
Education

Ph.D. in Economics, University of Michigan

M.A., Mathematics (Statistics), Univestity of Michigan

B.A., Mathematics, Princeton University

Econ One, 2011 - Present

Director, UCLA/Anderson Business Forecast, 2000- Present

Professor of Statistics (new department), UCLA, July 1997 - Present

Chauncey J. Medberry Chair in Management, Anderson Graduate

School of Management, 1990 - Present

Professor of Economics, UCLA, 1975 - Present

Associate Professor, Harvard University, 1973 -1975

Assistant Professor, Harvard University 1970 -1973

Assistant Professor, Wayne State University, 1970

Various regulatory agencies

U.S. District Court

Share this Article
August 23, 2018

Margie Daniel et al. vs. Ford Motor Company

Owners of Ford Focus automobiles alleged the cars suffered from excessive tire wear due to a suspension defect. Econ One and Prof Leamer reviewed analyses of vehicle auction data, warranty data, crash data, and third-party fleet data by opposing experts to assess evidence of whether or not there was a product defect.

Industries: Automotive

Latest Related Resources and Insights