Econ One’s expert economists have experience across a wide variety of services including antitrust, class certification, damages, financial markets and securities, intellectual property, international arbitration, labor and employment, and valuation and financial analysis.
Econ One’s expert economists have extensive industry specific experience. Our industry experience spans numerous industries including electric power markets, financial markets, healthcare, insurance, oil and gas, pharmaceutical, and more
Econ One’s resources including blogs, cases, news, and more provide a collection of materials from Econ One’s experts.
Ph.D. in Economics, The Johns Hopkins University
M.A. in Economics, The Johns Hopkins University
B.S. in Economics, Tulane University
Econ One, Managing Director, September 2018 ā Present
University of Utah, Economics Department, Professor, 2022 ā Present
Georgetown University, McDonough School of Business, Adjunct Professor, 2009 ā 2022
Economists, Inc., Principal, 2014 ā August 2018
Navigant Economics, Managing Director, 2010 ā 2013
Empiris, LLC, Managing Partner and President, 2008 ā 2010
Criterion Economics, LLC, (last position was President) 1999 ā 2008
LECG, Inc, Senior Economist, 1998 ā 1999
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Economic Analysis, Staff Economist, 1997 ā 1998
U.S. District Courts
State Courts
Federal Communications Commission
U.S. Senate and House committees
Private arbitration
Facebook and Google reframe newspaper articles in rich previews containing headlines, summaries, and photos. They also curate newspaper content alongside advertisements. Newspapers assert that this reframing and curation decreases the likelihood of a user clicking into the article, thereby depriving news publishers of clicks while enriching the dominant tech platforms. Newspapers also assert that the reframing and curation decreases newspaper subscriptions.
A newĀ studyĀ by Managing DirectorĀ Hal SingerĀ finds that allowing current market forces to dictate the newspapersā āpay sharesāāthat is, the portion of platform revenues that redounds to newspaper publishersāensures that newspapers are compensated at rates significantly below competitive levels. This underpayment, according to the study, results in underemployment of journalists and other news employees, as well as host of social ills associated with local news deserts, including less competent local governments, greater spread of partisanship and misinformation, removal of economic stimulus to local economies, and a reduction in the diversity of viewpoints, particularly among minority populations.
The study, which was commissioned by the News Media Alliance, concludes that the best way to correct this market failure is for the government to permit the news publishers (either newspapers alone, or all news publishers) to coordinate in their dealings with the digital platforms over payment terms and conditions, as contemplated in draft legislation known as the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act. The study also suggests that collective bargaining by itself might not be sufficient to achieve competitive payments, in which case some structured bargaining among the parties with an enforcement mechanism would be needed as a backstop.