Home » News Articles » Managing Director Hal Singer Releases New Study on the Power Imbalance between News Publishers and Big Tech


Econ One’s expert economists have experience across a wide variety of services including antitrust, class certification, damages, financial markets and securities, intellectual property, international arbitration, labor and employment, and valuation and financial analysis.


Econ One’s resources including blogs, cases, news, and more provide a collection of materials from Econ One’s experts.


Get an Inside look at Economics with the experts.
Managing Director

Ph.D. in Economics, The Johns Hopkins University

M.A. in Economics, The Johns Hopkins University

B.S. in Economics, Tulane University

Econ One, Managing Director, September 2018 – Present

University of Utah, Economics Department, Professor, 2022 – Present

Georgetown University, McDonough School of Business, Adjunct Professor, 2009 – 2022

Economists, Inc., Principal, 2014 – August 2018

Navigant Economics, Managing Director, 2010 – 2013

Empiris, LLC, Managing Partner and President, 2008 – 2010

Criterion Economics, LLC, (last position was President) 1999 – 2008

LECG, Inc, Senior Economist, 1998 – 1999

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Economic Analysis, Staff Economist, 1997 – 1998

U.S. District Courts

State Courts

Federal Communications Commission

U.S. Senate and House committees

Private arbitration

Share this Article
December 20, 2021

Managing Director Hal Singer Releases New Study on the Power Imbalance between News Publishers and Big Tech

Facebook and Google reframe newspaper articles in rich previews containing headlines, summaries, and photos. They also curate newspaper content alongside advertisements. Newspapers assert that this reframing and curation decreases the likelihood of a user clicking into the article, thereby depriving news publishers of clicks while enriching the dominant tech platforms. Newspapers also assert that the reframing and curation decreases newspaper subscriptions.

A new study by Managing Director Hal Singer finds that allowing current market forces to dictate the newspapers’ “pay shares”—that is, the portion of platform revenues that redounds to newspaper publishers—ensures that newspapers are compensated at rates significantly below competitive levels. This underpayment, according to the study, results in underemployment of journalists and other news employees, as well as host of social ills associated with local news deserts, including less competent local governments, greater spread of partisanship and misinformation, removal of economic stimulus to local economies, and a reduction in the diversity of viewpoints, particularly among minority populations.

The study, which was commissioned by the News Media Alliance, concludes that the best way to correct this market failure is for the government to permit the news publishers (either newspapers alone, or all news publishers) to coordinate in their dealings with the digital platforms over payment terms and conditions, as contemplated in draft legislation known as the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act. The study also suggests that collective bargaining by itself might not be sufficient to achieve competitive payments, in which case some structured bargaining among the parties with an enforcement mechanism would be needed as a backstop.

Read the study now. 

Latest Related Resources and Insights