|
Home Ā» Briefs Ā» Merced Irrigation District v. Barclays Bank PLC

Services

Econ One’s expert economists have experience across a wide variety of services including antitrust, class certification, damages, financial markets and securities, intellectual property, international arbitration, labor and employment, and valuation and financial analysis.

Resources

Econ One’s resources including blogs, cases, news, and more provide a collection of materials from Econ One’s experts.

Cases and Engagements
Get an Inside look at Economics with the experts.
Managing Director
Education

Ph.D. in Economics, University of California, Los Angeles

M.A. in Economics, University of California, Los Angeles

B.S. in Economics, Santa Clara University

Econ One, President, 1997 ā€“ Present

Founded Econ One, 1997

Micronomics, Inc., President and CEO, 1994 ā€“ 1997

Micronomics, Inc., Executive Vice President, 1988 ā€“ 1997

Cofounded Micronomics, Inc., 1988

National Economic Research Associates, Inc. (Last position was Senior Vice President and member of the Board of Directors) 1980 ā€“ 1988

U.S. District Court

U.S. Bankruptcy Court

State Court

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Various state tax and regulatory commissions

Private arbitration

International Arbitration

Share this Article
June 11, 2024

Merced Irrigation District v. Barclays Bank PLC

In June 2016, Merced Irrigation District, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, filed a lawsuit against Barclays Bank PLC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Merced Irrigation District v. Barclays Bank PLC (No. 1:15-cv-04878-VM-GWG), a civil class action, was filed following an investigation and Order Assessing Civil Penalties against Barclays Bank by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC Docket No 08-0800, dated July 16, 2013). Merced Irrigation District alleged that Barclays Bank violated the Sherman Act by engaging in a coordinated scheme to monopolize markets for trading electricity and electricity-related contracts and sought restitution for damages caused by the alleged scheme. Econ Oneā€™s expert Dr. Jeffrey Leitzinger was retained by counsel for Merced Irrigation District.

Dr. Leitzinger was asked to develop a method to measure the impact of Barclaysā€™ alleged illegal market power which it used to manipulate daily index prices for wholesale electricity for the purpose of economically benefitting itself and, as a consequence, creating harm to other market participants. He was also asked to show the manner in which the overcharges (or undercharges) applicable to the class members as a result of the alleged conduct could be calculated. Dr. Leitzinger submitted an expert report and provided deposition testimony. A settlement between the parties was reached in April of 2018 for $29 million.

Latest Related Resources and Insights