|
Home Ā» Briefs Ā» Ronald McAllister v. the St. Louis Rams

Services

Econ One’s expert economists have experience across a wide variety of services including antitrust, class certification, damages, financial markets and securities, intellectual property, international arbitration, labor and employment, and valuation and financial analysis.

Resources

Econ One’s resources including blogs, cases, news, and more provide a collection of materials from Econ One’s experts.

Cases and Engagements
Get an Inside look at Economics with the experts.
Managing Director
Education

Ph.D. in Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles

M.S. in Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles

B.A. in Mathematics/Economics, Claremont McKenna College

Econ One, August 2008 ā€“ Present

University of Pennsylvania, 2007 ā€“ 2008

University of California Los Angeles, 2007 ā€“ 2008

Self-Employed Statistical Consultant, 2004 ā€“ 2008

RAND Statistics Group, 2006

Lockheed Martin Missiles and Space, 2001 ā€“ 2003

U.S. District Court

State Court

Arbitration

Private Mediation

Share this Article
April 24, 2024

Ronald McAllister v. the St. Louis Rams

Ronald McAllister v. the St. Louis Rams, U.S. District Court Case No. 4:16-CV-00172-SNLJ (Eastern District of Missouri) was a consumer class action that was filed in 2016.Ā  Former season ticket holders of the St. Louis Rams alleged that they should be reimbursed for up to 30 percent of their personalized seating license because the Rams moved from St. Louis to Los Angeles with 9 years remaining on a 30-year lease in St. Louis.Ā  Econ One and Dr. Brian Kriegler were retained by the plaintiffs to propose a methodology for determining the amounts owed to the proposed class.

The Court granted the plaintiffsā€™ class certification motion in March 2018.Ā  Subsequently, Dr. Kriegler constructed and implemented a sampling design for selecting contracts signed by season ticket holders.Ā  In November 2018, the parties reached a $24 million settlement agreement to reimburse season ticket holders for their pro rata share of the 30-year commitment.Ā  The Court officially approved the settlement agreement in 2019.

Industries: Sports and Leagues
Latest Related Resources and Insights