Home » News Articles » The Market Definition Trap: New Article from Econ One’s Hal Singer

Services

Econ One’s expert economists have experience across a wide variety of services including antitrust, class certification, damages, financial markets and securities, intellectual property, international arbitration, labor and employment, and valuation and financial analysis.

Resources

Econ One’s resources including blogs, cases, news, and more provide a collection of materials from Econ One’s experts.

News
Get an Inside look at Economics with the experts.
Managing Director
Education

Ph.D. in Economics, The Johns Hopkins University

M.A. in Economics, The Johns Hopkins University

B.S. in Economics, Tulane University

Econ One, Managing Director, September 2018 – Present

University of Utah, Economics Department, Professor, 2022 – Present

Georgetown University, McDonough School of Business, Adjunct Professor, 2009 – 2022

Economists, Inc., Principal, 2014 – August 2018

Navigant Economics, Managing Director, 2010 – 2013

Empiris, LLC, Managing Partner and President, 2008 – 2010

Criterion Economics, LLC, (last position was President) 1999 – 2008

LECG, Inc, Senior Economist, 1998 – 1999

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Economic Analysis, Staff Economist, 1997 – 1998

U.S. District Courts

State Courts

Federal Communications Commission

U.S. Senate and House committees

Private arbitration

Share this Article
March 31, 2026

The Market Definition Trap: New Article from Econ One’s Hal Singer

Econ One Managing Director Hal Singer has authored a new article, “The Market Definition Trap,” examining how disputes over market definition can shape outcomes in antitrust litigation.

The article explores how defendants increasingly leverage market definition as a strategic battleground, shifting focus away from the core question of competitive harm. In modern antitrust cases, particularly under the rule of reason, plaintiffs are often required to establish market power, which can turn litigation into a complex and resource-intensive debate over how markets are defined.

By emphasizing these procedural and evidentiary dynamics, the article highlights how market definition can become dispositive in practice, even before the merits of alleged anticompetitive conduct are fully examined. This evolving landscape has important implications for litigants, courts, and economic experts involved in competition matters.

Read the full article:

The Market Definition Trap

Latest Related Resources and Insights